Poultry News
  • Production
    • Broiler Production
    • Ducks
    • Egg Production
    • Game
    • Hatching
    • Housing
    • Turkeys
  • Processing
  • Business & Politics
    • Business
    • Economics
    • EU & Politics
    • Marketing
    • People
    • Training & Education
  • Welfare
    • Environment
    • Food Safety
    • Vet & Medication
    • Welfare
  • Feed
  • Genetics
  • New Products
  • Magazines
    • August 2025
    • 2025 Poultry Health supplement
    • July 2025
    • 2025 National Egg and Poultry Awards finalists supplement
    • June 2025
    • 2025 Innovation supplement
    • May 2025
    • April 2025
    • March 2025
    • 2025 Feed and Nutrition supplement
    • February 2025
    • January 2025
    • December 2024
    • November 2024
    • October 2024
    • September 2024
    • 2024 Building for the Future supplement
    • August 2024
    • 2024 Poultry Health supplement
    • July 2024
    • 2024 National Egg and Poultry Awards finalists supplement
    • June 2024
    • 2024 Innovation supplement
    • Pig & Poultry Fair 2024
    • May 2024
    • April 2024
    • March 2024
    • February 2024
    • January 2024
    • December 2023
    • November 2023
    • Processing Equipment Supplement – Nov 2023
    • October 2023
    • Building Supplement – Sept 2023
    • September 2023
  • Jobs
    • Browse Jobs
    • Post a Job
    • Manage Jobs
  • Events
    • National Egg and Poultry Awards
    • Poultry Fair
    • Webinars
Twitter LinkedIn
  • FREE Email Newsletters
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact Us
Twitter LinkedIn
Podcast
Poultry News
  • Production
    • Broiler Production
    • Ducks
    • Egg Production
    • Game
    • Hatching
    • Housing
    • Turkeys
  • Processing
  • Business & Politics
    • Business
    • Economics
    • EU & Politics
    • Marketing
    • People
    • Training & Education
  • Welfare
    • Environment
    • Food Safety
    • Vet & Medication
    • Welfare
  • Feed
  • Genetics
  • New Products
  • Magazines
    1. August 2025
    2. 2025 Poultry Health supplement
    3. July 2025
    4. 2025 National Egg and Poultry Awards finalists supplement
    5. June 2025
    6. 2025 Innovation supplement
    7. May 2025
    8. April 2025
    9. March 2025
    10. 2025 Feed and Nutrition supplement
    11. February 2025
    12. January 2025
    13. December 2024
    14. November 2024
    15. October 2024
    16. September 2024
    17. 2024 Building for the Future supplement
    18. August 2024
    19. 2024 Poultry Health supplement
    20. July 2024
    21. 2024 National Egg and Poultry Awards finalists supplement
    22. June 2024
    23. 2024 Innovation supplement
    24. Pig & Poultry Fair 2024
    25. May 2024
    26. April 2024
    27. March 2024
    28. February 2024
    29. January 2024
    30. December 2023
    31. November 2023
    32. Processing Equipment Supplement – Nov 2023
    33. October 2023
    34. Building Supplement – Sept 2023
    35. September 2023
    Featured

    Poultry Business – August 2025 issue out now

    By Chloe RyanAugust 13, 2025
    Recent

    Poultry Business – August 2025 issue out now

    August 13, 2025

    2025 Poultry Health supplement out now

    August 13, 2025

    Poultry Business – July 2025 issue

    July 1, 2025
  • Jobs
    • Browse Jobs
    • Post a Job
    • Manage Jobs
  • Events
    • National Egg and Poultry Awards
    • Poultry Fair
    • Webinars
Twitter LinkedIn
Poultry News
Business & Politics

Cranswick poultry & pig farm planning permission rejected in Norfolk

Chloe RyanBy Chloe RyanApril 3, 20253 Mins Read
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email

Cranswick has mounted a robust defence of its proposal for a large pig and poultry unit in Norfolk, after West Norfolk Borough Council rejected it following a three-year process.

Its application to expand an existing site to house 714,000 chickens and 14,000 pigs near the villages of Methwold and Feltwell was considered in a crunch meeting on 3 April.

The decision had been expected following the publication in March of a 200 page report in which planning officers recommended the application be refused for two reasons.

With the site lying close to a number of European protected sites, planning officers said Cranswick had failed to demonstrate that the development ‘would not result in significant adverse effects on the protected sites’.

They also concluded that insufficient environmental information had been submitted to enable the council to reach a view on the impact of the project on the environment and climate change.

Just before the decision Cranswick reiterated its arguments that the development would ensure better use of local land, improve the existing site, and deliver higher welfare for pigs and poultry. The number of chickens housed in a unit would have been reduced by 20% compared to the Red Tractor standard and 100% of chickens would be hatched in the barn, rather than at a hatchery facility, under the NestBorn system.

The planning officer report revealed the plans received 12,604 objections, a 42,133-signature petition and seven representations in support. Objectors included five parish councils, a local campaign group, two local MPs and several NGOs.

Cranswick said it ‘fully recognised that a range of concerns and views have been expressed by local stakeholders and residents’, and had worked hard to address the issues.

But it criticised the approach of the council, noting that it was ‘extremely disappointed’ to find that the council’s report was ‘littered with basic factual errors’.

Cranswick said it had fully responded to all requests from the council to provide more information. However, it said that in the run-up to the hearing, the council said it needed further information, but was not clear what that information was and had not given it time to provide it.

Following the decision, Terry Jermy MP, Member for South West Norfolk, called it a “victory for local people and the environment.”

Jermy said, “I said from the beginning, no ifs, no buts, the megafarm should not go ahead and I am delighted that the application has been rejected.

“With over 15,000 objections and numerous of legal concerns raised based on environmental breaches this is an important victory.”

Formal objections to the application had been made by both Feltwell and Methwold Parish Councils and a whole range of other organisations as well as local residents.

Cranswick said it was “incredibly disappointed” and called it a “bad day for the sustainable production of British meat.” It said it would review the decision and consider its next options.

 

 

Share. Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email
Previous ArticleCranswick mounts defence of Norfolk pig & poultry farm, as planning decision imminent
Next Article Branded egg white business sold to Eurovo Group
Chloe Ryan

Editor of Poultry Business, Chloe has spent the past decade writing about the food industry from farming, through manufacturing, retail and foodservice. When not working, dog walking and reading biographies are her favourite hobbies.

Read Similar Stories

Business & Politics

Meat smuggling risks major disease outbreak, warn MPs

September 9, 20254 Mins Read
Business & Politics

Emma Reynolds named new Defra secretary in Labour reshuffle

September 8, 20251 Min Read
Business & Politics

EU broiler price holds above €3/kg mark

September 5, 20253 Mins Read
Latest News

Four areas of biosecurity to consider when building or adapting poultry houses

September 12, 2025

Comment: Are you managing your litter responsibly?

September 12, 2025

Global egg market to grow 22% by 2035

September 11, 2025
Sponsored Content

How can UK farmers make poultry profitable without losing welfare?

September 1, 2025

Precision Nutrition: A global approach to reducing broiler feed cost.

August 1, 2025
© 2024 MA Agriculture Ltd, a Mark Allen Group company

Privacy Policy | Cookies Policy | Terms & Conditions

  • Farmers Weekly
  • AA Farmer
  • Farm Contractor
  • Pig World

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.