Poultry News
  • Production
    • Broiler Production
    • Ducks
    • Egg Production
    • Game
    • Hatching
    • Housing
    • Turkeys
  • Processing
  • Business & Politics
    • Business
    • Economics
    • EU & Politics
    • Marketing
    • People
    • Training & Education
  • Welfare
    • Environment
    • Food Safety
    • Vet & Medication
    • Welfare
  • Feed
  • Genetics
  • New Products
  • Magazines
    • March 2026
    • 2026 Feed & Nutrition supplement
    • February 2026
    • January 2026
    • December 2025
    • November 2025
    • October 2025
    • September 2025
    • 2025 Buildings supplement
    • August 2025
    • 2025 Poultry Health supplement
    • July 2025
    • 2025 National Egg and Poultry Awards finalists supplement
    • June 2025
    • 2025 Innovation supplement
    • May 2025
    • April 2025
    • March 2025
    • 2025 Feed and Nutrition supplement
    • February 2025
    • January 2025
    • December 2024
    • November 2024
    • October 2024
    • September 2024
    • 2024 Building for the Future supplement
    • August 2024
    • 2024 Poultry Health supplement
    • July 2024
    • 2024 National Egg and Poultry Awards finalists supplement
    • June 2024
    • 2024 Innovation supplement
    • Pig & Poultry Fair 2024
    • May 2024
    • April 2024
    • March 2024
    • February 2024
    • January 2024
    • December 2023
    • November 2023
    • Processing Equipment Supplement – Nov 2023
    • October 2023
    • Building Supplement – Sept 2023
    • September 2023
  • Jobs
    • Browse Jobs
    • Post a Job
    • Manage Jobs
  • Events
    • National Egg and Poultry Awards
    • Poultry Fair
    • Webinars
Twitter LinkedIn
  • FREE Email Newsletters
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact Us
Twitter LinkedIn
Podcast
Poultry News
  • Production
    • Broiler Production
    • Ducks
    • Egg Production
    • Game
    • Hatching
    • Housing
    • Turkeys
  • Processing
  • Business & Politics
    • Business
    • Economics
    • EU & Politics
    • Marketing
    • People
    • Training & Education
  • Welfare
    • Environment
    • Food Safety
    • Vet & Medication
    • Welfare
  • Feed
  • Genetics
  • New Products
  • Magazines
    1. March 2026
    2. 2026 Feed & Nutrition supplement
    3. February 2026
    4. January 2026
    5. December 2025
    6. November 2025
    7. October 2025
    8. September 2025
    9. 2025 Buildings supplement
    10. August 2025
    11. 2025 Poultry Health supplement
    12. July 2025
    13. 2025 National Egg and Poultry Awards finalists supplement
    14. June 2025
    15. 2025 Innovation supplement
    16. May 2025
    17. April 2025
    18. March 2025
    19. 2025 Feed and Nutrition supplement
    20. February 2025
    21. January 2025
    22. December 2024
    23. November 2024
    24. October 2024
    25. September 2024
    26. 2024 Building for the Future supplement
    27. August 2024
    28. 2024 Poultry Health supplement
    29. July 2024
    30. 2024 National Egg and Poultry Awards finalists supplement
    31. June 2024
    32. 2024 Innovation supplement
    33. Pig & Poultry Fair 2024
    34. May 2024
    35. April 2024
    36. March 2024
    37. February 2024
    38. January 2024
    39. December 2023
    40. November 2023
    41. Processing Equipment Supplement – Nov 2023
    42. October 2023
    43. Building Supplement – Sept 2023
    44. September 2023
    Featured

    Poultry Business – March 2026 issue out now

    By Chloe RyanMarch 11, 2026
    Recent

    Poultry Business – March 2026 issue out now

    March 11, 2026

    Poultry Business – 2026 Feed & Nutrition supplement out now

    March 11, 2026

    Poultry Business – February 2026 issue out now

    February 11, 2026
  • Jobs
    • Browse Jobs
    • Post a Job
    • Manage Jobs
  • Events
    • National Egg and Poultry Awards
    • Poultry Fair
    • Webinars
Twitter LinkedIn
Poultry News
News

One Health approach without ‘culture of blame’ is key to tackling antimicrobial resistance

Chloe RyanBy Chloe RyanMay 13, 20194 Mins Read
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email

A collaborative One Health approach without a culture of blame is key to containing and controlling the threat of antimicrobial resistance in animals, humans and the environment, the British Veterinary Association (BVA) has said in an updated position on responsible antimicrobial use in food producing animals.

The position, launched on 10 May consolidates and expands upon BVA’s existing antimicrobial resistance policies. It proposes 15 overarching recommendations on responsible antimicrobial stewardship for vets, farmers and government.

94% of vets said in a 2018 BVA Voice of the Veterinary Profession survey that they were concerned about antimicrobial resistance. More than nine in ten vets mentioned that they were concerned about the potential inability to treat infection. BVA’s recommendations come amid an increasing global push for One Health working to protect antimicrobials for the sake of animal and human health, reflected both in the UK government’s 20-year visionand new five-year national action plan and the recent UN Interagency Coordinating Group report.

BVA’s position reiterates that vets should continue to be guided by the seven principles of responsible antimicrobial use. These include avoiding inappropriate use, monitoring antimicrobial sensitivity, working with clients to avoid the need for antimicrobials (through preventative measures such as herd or flock health plans, for example), and recording and justifying any deviations from protocols. As part of this, BVA has released a new-look seven-point-plan poster for vets to display on practice walls.

It is also encouraging vets to familiarise themselves with the antimicrobial reduction targets for their sector and continue to work with farmers and stock keepers to achieve these. 

British Veterinary Association President Simon Doherty said: “Antimicrobial resistance is a shared problem that must be addressed by medical, veterinary and environmental professionals collaboratively and not subject to a culture of blame.

“BVA is committed to providing continued leadership on the issue. Ongoing work by vets, farmers and industry has already led to a 40% reduction in sales of antibiotics meant for use in food-producing animals over the last five years, with sales of the Highest Priority Critically Important Antibiotics dropping by 52% in this period.

“We must maintain this momentum in the face of the ongoing global threat posed by antimicrobial resistance. BVA will continue working with our specialist divisions and key stakeholders to build upon current achievements. We currently chair the UK One Health Coordination Group, which includes stakeholders representing human, animal and environmental health and welfare interests.”

“A collaborative approach to AMR, underpinned by a commitment from each of us within the veterinary profession to maintain the highest standards of stewardship in using antimicrobials, especially Critically Important Antibiotics, is the only way we can preserve these essential medicines for both humans and animals in the future.”

BVA’s updated position reiterates that Critically Important Antibiotics should remain available for veterinary use in the interest of animal welfare. However, it calls on vets to restrict the use of Highest Priority Critically Important Antibiotics as a last resort, where no other product will be effective for the condition being treated. Where the welfare of the individual animal, herd or flock, and wider context are considered, vets should consider euthanasia as an alternative treatment option.

Other recommendations include:

  • Veterinary practices should develop a written policy on appropriate metaphylaxis and record every instance of metaphylactic use of antimicrobials.
  • Farm assurance schemes should incorporate responsible use of antimicrobials as a scheme requirement.
  • The development of effective diagnostic tools – for culture, sensitivity and monitoring for resistance genes – must be prioritised and there should be a greater focus on improving surveillance and information sharing.
  • Farmers and stock keepers should be empowered and incentivised to work with their vets to achieve responsible antimicrobial use on farms.
  • Government should promote incentives to improve husbandry and biosecurity measures on farm.
  • Government should continue to work with vets and industry to review and set further rational targets through the RUMA Targets Task Force.
Share. Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email
Previous ArticleTotal farm incomes fall, but egg and poultry producers benefit from boost in demand
Next Article Management changes at Marel Poultry
Chloe Ryan

Editor of Poultry Business, Chloe has spent the past decade writing about the food industry from farming, through manufacturing, retail and foodservice. When not working, dog walking and reading biographies are her favourite hobbies.

Read Similar Stories

Feed & Nutrition

The potential for pulses in poultry rations

March 11, 20265 Mins Read
Feed & Nutrition

Building better layers

March 10, 20264 Mins Read
News

Sector resilience in focus at NFU conference poultry session

February 27, 20263 Mins Read
Latest News

Hugh Carter’s carbon journey

March 12, 2026

NFU meets Defra to discuss impacts of global conflict on UK food supply chain

March 12, 2026

Poultry Business – March 2026 issue out now

March 11, 2026
Sponsored Content

Stay one step ahead of outbreaks

December 3, 2025

Can Aviance improve production and shell quality in full laying cycle?

October 1, 2025
© 2024 MA Agriculture Ltd, a Mark Allen Group company

Privacy Policy | Cookies Policy | Terms & Conditions

  • Farmers Weekly
  • AA Farmer
  • Farm Contractor
  • Pig World

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.