Poultry News
  • Production
    • Broiler Production
    • Ducks
    • Egg Production
    • Game
    • Hatching
    • Housing
    • Turkeys
  • Processing
  • Business & Politics
    • Business
    • Economics
    • EU & Politics
    • Marketing
    • People
    • Training & Education
  • Welfare
    • Environment
    • Food Safety
    • Vet & Medication
    • Welfare
  • Feed
  • Genetics
  • New Products
  • Magazines
    • November 2023
    • Processing Equipment Supplement – Nov 2023
    • October 2023
    • Building Supplement – Sept 2023
    • September 2023
    • Finalists Supplement – National Egg & Poultry Awards 2023
    • July 2023
  • Jobs
    • Browse Jobs
    • Post a Job
    • Manage Jobs
  • Events
    • National Egg and Poultry Awards
    • Poultry Fair
Twitter LinkedIn
  • FREE Email Newsletters
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • FREE Magazine Subscriptions
Twitter LinkedIn
Podcast
Poultry News
  • Production
    • Broiler Production
    • Ducks
    • Egg Production
    • Game
    • Hatching
    • Housing
    • Turkeys
  • Processing
  • Business & Politics
    • Business
    • Economics
    • EU & Politics
    • Marketing
    • People
    • Training & Education
  • Welfare
    • Environment
    • Food Safety
    • Vet & Medication
    • Welfare
  • Feed
  • Genetics
  • New Products
  • Magazines
    1. November 2023
    2. Processing Equipment Supplement – Nov 2023
    3. October 2023
    4. Building Supplement – Sept 2023
    5. September 2023
    6. Finalists Supplement – National Egg & Poultry Awards 2023
    7. July 2023
    Featured

    Poultry Business – Processing Equipment Supplement – November 2023

    By Chloe RyanOctober 31, 2023
    Recent

    Poultry Business – Processing Equipment Supplement – November 2023

    October 31, 2023

    Poultry Business – November 2023

    October 31, 2023

    Poultry Business – October 2023

    September 28, 2023
  • Jobs
    • Browse Jobs
    • Post a Job
    • Manage Jobs
  • Events
    • National Egg and Poultry Awards
    • Poultry Fair
Twitter LinkedIn
Poultry News
Production

Feature: Where there’s muck, there’s brass

Chloe RyanBy Chloe RyanJune 14, 201911 Mins Read
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email

25% of all ammonia emissions come from livestock manures spread on land. In its Clean Air Strategy published in January, the government said farmers would be supported to find alternative ways to use muck. So, what are the best ways of making money from poultry manure?

In the government’s Clean Air Strategy, published in January 2019, the topic of muck spreading was given a lot of attention. The report said the government would “require and support farmers to make investments that will reduce emissions.”

Although it’s not yet clear what this will involve, it is clear that legislation and controls on land spreading are likely to become more onerous in future. At a meeting of members of the British Free Range Producers Association (BFREPA) in May, Jason Gittins and Jon Walton of ADAS, discussed the situation with producers and outlined some alternative options.

Money from muck feature. ADAS Jason Gittins

Gittins and Walton have published a report on behalf of BFREPA called ‘Improving the value and sustainability of laying hen manure’ which examines the various options producers can consider, given the legislative landscape is likely to shift in the coming years.

“Current practices may not be possible in the future,” said Gittins. “Therefore, there is increased interest in alternative uses of poultry manure.”

There are four main alternative ways of dealing with poultry manure other than land spreading.

  • Incineration
  • Drying and pelleting
  • Composting
  • Anaerobic digestion

Incineration of poultry manure

Incineration can provide on-farm heat, electricity for your own use or sale, and residual ash which can be used for fertiliser.

Incineration of poultry manure is done through fluidised bed technology. BHSL is the only provider in the UK at the moment, said Gittins, and the process is regulated by APHA. It is fairly expensive to set up, with capital costs between £1.3 million and £2 million.

Other costs include labour, maintenance and start-up fuel. The returns generated from incineration depend on feed-in tariff (FIT) and Renewable Heat Incentive (RHI) rates and the value of the energy generated. Residual ash can be sold as fertiliser around £40/t and the volume of ash is between 8 – 15% of weight of manure.

Drying and pelleting

Manure belts that remove and dry waste from poultry houses typically produce a product containing 80-90% dry matter in 48 hours. The drier the matter, the higher the value. The final weight is around a third of the initial weight.

Gittins said the estimated cost for installing the equipment amounted to around £2.50 per bird on 32,000 unit. Retrofitting of manure belts is possible but the cost is around 20% higher compared to installing them in new buildings. The advantages include low operational costs. The product can be sold for around £41 per tonne for dry manure.

If you then go on to pellet the dry manure, the costs rise. The estimated capital costs for pelleting are equivalent to around £4 per bird. Gittins said it cost between £20-£35 per tonne to produce pellets. There are also big energy costs associated with the pelleting process. It is a competitive market to get into, but the product sells for around £16 per 20kg bag at retail so there are good returns for those who do successfully find a market.  

Composting

Poultry manure can also be composted. There are two options, either an open pyramid system or a vessel system such as the module system from Big Dutchman.

The aim of composting is to produce high quality fertiliser for range of outlets. Once composted, poultry manure is lighter and easier to handle with between 60-70% dry matter. It is key to mix the manure with green materials to achieve the right mix of carbon and nitrogen. The process takes 8-12 weeks and run off containment is needed.

There can be low capital costs if producers are able to make use of existing buildings. In vessel systems it typically costs £150 per tonne of material composted per year. However, it is difficult to get good returns on compost and the economic model is usually based on the gate fee charged for incoming raw materials rather than on sale of final compost alone. Producers charge around £20-30 to take easy composting greens, and between £80-90 to take difficult to handle green materials.

Anerobic digestion

Anerobic digestion produces gas that is used to generate electricity. The process gives a good gas yield but there are difficulties to overcome with poultry manure. High nitrogen content, such as poultry manure is generally limited to 20% of feedstock in total. So producers need to find 80% of something else to balance the content. The other problem is the presence of calcium in poultry manure, which clogs up the machine and needs to be removed.

There are several projects aiming to overcome these issues at the moment, said Gittins. “If those come to fruition it opens up the area much more for poultry manure.” There are high costs, estimated at between £1.4m to £2.5m to set up. The returns are dependent on the FIT and RHI and digestate also has value.

Gittins said that although capital costs were generally very high, if there is increased interest, prices may come down in the future. Groups of producers could come together with shared facilities, he suggested. “The economics are dependent on future government policy, but support may be given under any future government’s Clean Air policy.”

Incineration

James Baxter has 128,000 free-range laying hens on his farm near Stranraer in Scotland. He uses an FBC750 Combined Heat and Power (CHP) system from BHSL to incinerate the poultry manure produced, using the energy generated for heating and electricity.

2016 BFREPA Conference

Because of the farm location, Baxter does not supply energy to the national grid so it is all used on farm.

His decision to opt for manure incineration came after a review of a number of different options as alternatives to land-spreading. He considered anaerobic digestion bit identified a number of practical difficulties, concluding that other materials were better suited to the digestion process than the manure from his laying hens.

He also considered other CHP machines, including small scale ‘plug and play’ units, which are often used for power generation in developing countries. A number of other machines and technologies were considered but these were discounted for reasons including lack of track record of burning laying hen manure, the need to pellet the manure prior to incineration, potentially high maintenance costs and concerns over high emission levels.

With a fluidised bed incineration system now in place, Baxter currently burns around 11-12 tonnes of manure each day from his 128,000 hens and sees manure burning as part of an integrated approach with heat being supplied back to the poultry houses to improve the environment and dry the manure in-house on the belts. The electricity generated is used on the farm to reduce the utility costs. Residual ash from the process is used as a fertiliser on farm or sold to other farmers but it is expected that it will soon be sold to fertiliser companies to help them meet their environmental requirements for the use of recycled materials in their products.

Baxter has sought to benefit from government incentive schemes such as RHI and ROCS but he has found the accreditation process to be complex and that expected payments were severely delayed. This could have important negative implications for cash flow for businesses reliant on such payments. Key compliance issues for payments included the need for incoming manure not to have been further processed prior to incineration and there must also be a clear and demonstrable use for the heat and electricity generated.

Overall, he considers that £2 million would be a reasonable budget figure for capital costs for such a development and on that basis accepts that a larger number of birds are needed to justify the investment. However, the development of smaller and therefore cheaper machines in future will happen if demand is, which may create opportunities for others.

Alternatively, installing a unit on a separate industrial or other sire with an on-site demand for heat and electricity could be an alternative model for the future. This could then have manure supplied to it by a number of local producers.

Baxter estimates his annual income from the system is currently around £270,000 per year, based on RHI payments, electricity generated and sales of the ash as fertiliser. Having carefully worked out the costs, he expects the equipment will have been paid for within seven years. This does not take into account any benefits from improved flock performance, which arise from improved environmental conditions, better flock health and higher in-house temperatures in winter, leading to reduced feed use.

Anaerobic digestion

Charles and Jo Mear have a 28,000 bird free-range egg production unit together with egg packing facilities and a mill for producing feed using locally grown wheat. They also manage arable crops on an enterprise of over 80 hectares in Bedfordshire.

Charles Mear

Business diversification has been a key focus to ensure profitability and more recently, they have installed a solar PV system and an anaerobic digestion plant for renewable energy and heat production. The renewable heat from the AD plant is used to dry manure over a belt system supplied by Dorset Green Machine, model MB9.

The AD system was installed in 2016 with biogas used for electricity generation through a 165 kilowatt rated output generator. Around 10% of the electricity generated will be used on farm, the rest is fed into the grid. The digester is a horizontal plug flow system which is six metres wide, four metres deep and 42 metres long with a capacity of around 1000m3. The feedstock is 60% maize purpose-grown crops (PGC) and 40% rye PGC grown on their farm or supplied by neighbours. The digester generates 2,500 tonnes per year of solid digestate after separation from the liquid fraction. The original intention was to include laying hen manure within the feedstock mix but the AD system could not operate with the build-up of calcium grit.

The digestion process takes between 60 and 65 days to complete. The digestate is separated through a screw press and the liquid and solid fractions are land spread on the farm for their fertiliser value, replacing bought-in fertilisers. Some is also sold locally as a fertiliser, soil improver or mulch to farmers and allotment groups.

The farm has installed a belt drier to dry the laying hen manure and this operates off the renewable heat from the biogas fuelled CHP generator. Two heat exchangers have been installed to provide heat to the drier.

The birds are housed in flat deck systems with verandas on both sides. The laying cycles are staggered so the farm generates around 300 tonnes of manure every 6.5 months. The drier has a throughput f around 2.4 tonnes per day. The manure entering the system is around 52% dry matter and it is dried to 85% dry matter.

Mear is developing a market for the residual solids produced on the farm and is conducting trials based on dried manure blends with the digestate solid fraction. The farm engages with local allotments and amateur gardeners and employs a consultant to help develop products and markets. To help with the marketing of the dried organic fertiliser products, Mear is experimenting with methods of further processing including a shredder to reduce the particle size of the chicken manure prior to drying, pellet extrusion and packaging. The farm has Leader Grant support for this.

The cost of installing the AD plant, the drying system and all the associated ancillary equipment including digestate liquor lagoons, heat exchangers and air scrubbers was around £1.8 million and it was not without problems. The initial aim was to get to 7.2p per kilowatt hour through the RHI scheme. However, due to the design and build company going into liquidation and rapid changes to government support, the Mears had to accept 3.2p. They have received no payments since the plant first became operational in April 2017 and this has had a huge impact on cashflow.

 

Share. Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email
Previous ArticleNFU President urges leadership candidates to back British farming
Next Article The Coccidiosis challenge
Chloe Ryan

Editor of Poultry Business, Chloe has spent the past decade writing about the food industry from farming, through manufacturing, retail and foodservice. When not working, dog walking and reading biographies are her favourite hobbies.

Read Similar Stories

Egg Production

RSPCA Assured introduces new welfare standards for laying hens, including verandas

November 13, 20233 Mins Read
Production

Poultry producers asked to complete new survey about production intentions

November 10, 20232 Mins Read
Egg Production

Egg producers in EU to benefit from new marketing rules

November 8, 20231 Min Read
Latest News

Coffey out at Defra, as Steve Barclay appointed new secretary of state

November 13, 2023

RSPCA Assured introduces new welfare standards for laying hens, including verandas

November 13, 2023

Avian flu confirmed in commercial turkeys

November 13, 2023
Sponsored Content

It’s time to MIX it up! Your flubendazole alternative is already here

November 1, 2023

Narasin delivers stable and continuous coccidiosis control

August 1, 2023
Pig and Poultry Fair
© 2023 Lewis Business Media. All Rights Reserved.
Lewis Business Media, Suite A, Arun House, Office Village, River Way, Uckfield, TN22 1SL

Privacy Policy | Cookie Policy | Terms & Conditions

  • Farmers Weekly
  • AA Farmer
  • Farm Contractor
  • Pig World

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

We use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences and repeat visits. By clicking “ACCEPT ALL”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies. However, you may visit "Cookie Settings" to provide a controlled consent.
Cookie SettingsREJECT ALLAccept All
Manage consent

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. These cookies ensure basic functionalities and security features of the website, anonymously.
CookieDurationDescription
AWSALBCORS7 daysThis cookie is managed by Amazon Web Services and is used for load balancing.
cookielawinfo-checkbox-necessary1 yearSet by the GDPR Cookie Consent plugin, this cookie is used to record the user consent for the cookies in the "Necessary" category .
PHPSESSIDsessionThis cookie is native to PHP applications. The cookie is used to store and identify a users' unique session ID for the purpose of managing user session on the website. The cookie is a session cookies and is deleted when all the browser windows are closed.
Others
Other uncategorized cookies are those that are being analyzed and have not been classified into a category as yet.
CookieDurationDescription
AWSALB7 daysAWSALB is a cookie generated by the Application load balancer in the Amazon Web Services. It works slightly different from AWSELB.
explat_test_aa_weekly_lohp_2021_week_4517 days 8 hoursNo description
ppwp_wp_session30 minutesNo description
tk_ai14 daysGathers information for WordPress by themselves, first party analytics tool about how WP services are used. A collection of internal metrics for user activity, used to improve user experience.
tk_qssessionGathers information for WordPress by themselves, first party analytics tool about how WP services are used. A collection of internal metrics for user activity, used to improve user experience.
Advertisement
Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with relevant ads and marketing campaigns. These cookies track visitors across websites and collect information to provide customized ads.
CookieDurationDescription
OAGEOsessionOpenX sets this cookie to avoid the repeated display of the same ad.
OAID1 yearThis cookie is set when an AdsWizz website visitor have opted out the collection of information by AdsWizz service or opted to disable the targeted ads by AdsWizz.
Analytics
Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.
CookieDurationDescription
_ga2 yearsThe _ga cookie, installed by Google Analytics, calculates visitor, session and campaign data and also keeps track of site usage for the site's analytics report. The cookie stores information anonymously and assigns a randomly generated number to recognize unique visitors.
_gat_gtag_UA_31822138_71 minuteSet by Google to distinguish users.
_gid1 dayInstalled by Google Analytics, _gid cookie stores information on how visitors use a website, while also creating an analytics report of the website's performance. Some of the data that are collected include the number of visitors, their source, and the pages they visit anonymously.
tk_lr1 yearThe tk_lr is a referral cookie set by the JetPack plugin on sites using WooCommerce, which analyzes referrer behaviour for Jetpack.
tk_or5 yearsThe tk_or is a referral cookie set by the JetPack plugin on sites using WooCommerce, which analyzes referrer behaviour for Jetpack.
tk_r3d3 daysJetPack installs this cookie to collect internal metrics for user activity and in turn improve user experience.
SAVE & ACCEPT
Powered by CookieYes Logo