Poultry News
  • Production
    • Broiler Production
    • Ducks
    • Egg Production
    • Game
    • Hatching
    • Housing
    • Turkeys
  • Processing
  • Business & Politics
    • Business
    • Economics
    • EU & Politics
    • Marketing
    • People
    • Training & Education
  • Welfare
    • Environment
    • Food Safety
    • Vet & Medication
    • Welfare
  • Feed
  • Genetics
  • New Products
  • Magazines
    • July 2025
    • 2025 National Egg and Poultry Awards finalists supplement
    • June 2025
    • 2025 Innovation supplement
    • May 2025
    • April 2025
    • March 2025
    • 2025 Feed and Nutrition supplement
    • February 2025
    • January 2025
    • December 2024
    • November 2024
    • October 2024
    • September 2024
    • 2024 Building for the Future supplement
    • August 2024
    • 2024 Poultry Health supplement
    • July 2024
    • 2024 National Egg and Poultry Awards finalists supplement
    • June 2024
    • 2024 Innovation supplement
    • Pig & Poultry Fair 2024
    • May 2024
    • April 2024
    • March 2024
    • February 2024
    • January 2024
    • December 2023
    • November 2023
    • Processing Equipment Supplement – Nov 2023
    • October 2023
    • Building Supplement – Sept 2023
    • September 2023
  • Jobs
    • Browse Jobs
    • Post a Job
    • Manage Jobs
  • Events
    • National Egg and Poultry Awards
    • Poultry Fair
    • Webinars
Twitter LinkedIn
  • FREE Email Newsletters
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact Us
Twitter LinkedIn
Podcast
Poultry News
  • Production
    • Broiler Production
    • Ducks
    • Egg Production
    • Game
    • Hatching
    • Housing
    • Turkeys
  • Processing
  • Business & Politics
    • Business
    • Economics
    • EU & Politics
    • Marketing
    • People
    • Training & Education
  • Welfare
    • Environment
    • Food Safety
    • Vet & Medication
    • Welfare
  • Feed
  • Genetics
  • New Products
  • Magazines
    1. July 2025
    2. 2025 National Egg and Poultry Awards finalists supplement
    3. June 2025
    4. 2025 Innovation supplement
    5. May 2025
    6. April 2025
    7. March 2025
    8. 2025 Feed and Nutrition supplement
    9. February 2025
    10. January 2025
    11. December 2024
    12. November 2024
    13. October 2024
    14. September 2024
    15. 2024 Building for the Future supplement
    16. August 2024
    17. 2024 Poultry Health supplement
    18. July 2024
    19. 2024 National Egg and Poultry Awards finalists supplement
    20. June 2024
    21. 2024 Innovation supplement
    22. Pig & Poultry Fair 2024
    23. May 2024
    24. April 2024
    25. March 2024
    26. February 2024
    27. January 2024
    28. December 2023
    29. November 2023
    30. Processing Equipment Supplement – Nov 2023
    31. October 2023
    32. Building Supplement – Sept 2023
    33. September 2023
    Featured

    Poultry Business – July 2025 issue

    By Chloe RyanJuly 1, 2025
    Recent

    Poultry Business – July 2025 issue

    July 1, 2025

    Poultry Business – 2025 National Egg and Poultry Awards finalists supplement

    July 1, 2025

    Poultry Business – June 2025 issue

    June 9, 2025
  • Jobs
    • Browse Jobs
    • Post a Job
    • Manage Jobs
  • Events
    • National Egg and Poultry Awards
    • Poultry Fair
    • Webinars
Twitter LinkedIn
Poultry News
Feed & Nutrition

Is Europe leaving us behind on PAP?

Chloe RyanBy Chloe RyanNovember 4, 20224 Mins Read
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email

Premier Nutrition recently held a conference where delegates heard from Darling Ingredients’ Carine van Vuure talking about the EU’s experiences on introducing processed animal protein (PAP) into poultry feed, and the nutritional benefits of being able to do so.

At the conference, van Vuure shared how the latest changes in regulation, introduced in the EU in September 2021, have created opportunities for both better bird health and welfare, as well as reducing carbon footprints for producers.  However, she warned that the use of PAP in manufacturing is far from straightforward.

“One of the main drivers for relaxing the regulations last year was the EU Farm to Fork strategy,” she said.  “We could prove we were able to make better use of proteins, optimise recycling of former foodstuffs and valorise under-utilised resources, such as insect protein.

“It now means that not only fats and oils, protein hydrolysates, and bone phosphates from all species can be used, but additionally porcine animal protein can now enter the European poultry supply chain with the meat going into both the retail and food service markets.”

However, the exceptionally strict rules around segregation of the PAP product have created significant challenges, particularly for smaller EU feed mills. “The regulations demand proof of segregation and how it is organised, including separate access and a completely separate manufacturing line,” van Vuure said.  “Effectively you need to demonstrate two separate businesses, even though they are sharing the same land space”.

Nevertheless, the benefits of using PAP as a nutritional ingredient has been repeatedly proven in trial work carried out at Wageningen.  Trials testing  digestibility and performance in laying hens and broilers using variations in  pork meals and its processing methods have not only managed to  displace the use of soyabean meal, giving obvious environmental  benefits, but they have seen less wet litter, less feather damage (weeks 18-40), healthier bone strength and density from the organic origin macro-minerals, better locomotion, and less skin damage.

With such enormous environmental and health and welfare benefits, it was important that the introduction of PAP to consumers was well managed.  This process was started with a consumer perception study, also carried out by Wageningen, where nearly 5,000 men and women participated in five countries, including the UK, all aged between 36 – 55 years old.

“It probably won’t surprise you that consumer knowledge of animal feed is very low,” van Vuure said.  “However, their gut feel is that ingredients should be natural, healthy and plant-based, and their top three motives for buying meat is taste, price and health benefits.

“When asked about feeding animal proteins, 44% were neutral.  That may sound like good news, however there was a danger that this sector could be influenced by activists and are easy to sway either way, so caution was needed as we introduced PAP.”

Using the EU’s experiences, van Vuure recommended that each country needs tailor made messages to inform consumers about the industry, but summarised those used by the EU as follows:

Chickens are omnivores, they naturally eat proteins

PAP contains digestible, essential amino acids

PAP helps to keep chickens healthy

PAP is local; sourced and produced in the EU and it can replace the use of soyabean meal

There are no anti-nutritional factors in PAP

Looking at how PAP could influence diets in the UK, Premier’s poultry  nutritionist Ralph Bishop presented matrix values and two example  rations. The most notable point was, the GFLI carbon footprint for  Brazilian soyabean meal is 4285kg/CO2e including land use change (LUC) compared to a porcine PAP which carries a carbon footprint value of 657kg/CO2e including LUC.

“To introduce 5% PAP into a broiler grower diet can reduce soya by ~5% and significantly reduce rock phosphate requirement dependent on the ash content of the PAP,” said Bishop.  “There is also a reduction in potassium, which will aid litter quality with associated welfare benefits.”

In a peak layer ration, 5% inclusion of PAP reduced soya by ~4% in the formulation shared by Bishop, whilst maintaining digestible amino acid levels. Similar to the broiler example, dependent on the ash content of PAP, both additions of rock limestone and phosphate can be reduced whilst potassium reduction will help litter quality.

At the end of two interesting presentations, the consensus from delegates was that the UK is some way off being able to manage the introduction of PAP, both from a management and use perspective, as well as a consumer perspective. The experiences of the EU will be invaluable in steering decisions in the future, should UK legislation change to allow its use.

 

Share. Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email
Previous ArticleComment: Is it still worth placing birds?
Next Article Hubbard sales director stands down
Chloe Ryan

Editor of Poultry Business, Chloe has spent the past decade writing about the food industry from farming, through manufacturing, retail and foodservice. When not working, dog walking and reading biographies are her favourite hobbies.

Read Similar Stories

News

Comment: Focus on the things you can control

July 3, 20253 Mins Read
News

Fridays wins Court of Appeal judgment on business rates

July 1, 20252 Mins Read
New Products

New disinfectant offers breakthrough in coccidiosis control

June 26, 20252 Mins Read
Latest News

Pershore’s finest

July 4, 2025

Tackling red mite

July 4, 2025

Comment: Morrisons painful decision to stock imported chicken

July 4, 2025
Sponsored Content

Navigating Sustainability in Egg Production: Practical Steps for Producers

June 1, 2025

Maintain stable and continuous coccidiosis control amidst stocking density reductions

November 1, 2024
© 2024 MA Agriculture Ltd, a Mark Allen Group company

Privacy Policy | Cookies Policy | Terms & Conditions

  • Farmers Weekly
  • AA Farmer
  • Farm Contractor
  • Pig World

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.