Poultry News
  • Production
    • Broiler Production
    • Ducks
    • Egg Production
    • Game
    • Hatching
    • Housing
    • Turkeys
  • Processing
  • Business & Politics
    • Business
    • Economics
    • EU & Politics
    • Marketing
    • People
    • Training & Education
  • Welfare
    • Environment
    • Food Safety
    • Vet & Medication
    • Welfare
  • Feed
  • Genetics
  • New Products
  • Magazines
    • October 2025
    • September 2025
    • 2025 Buildings supplement
    • August 2025
    • 2025 Poultry Health supplement
    • July 2025
    • 2025 National Egg and Poultry Awards finalists supplement
    • June 2025
    • 2025 Innovation supplement
    • May 2025
    • April 2025
    • March 2025
    • 2025 Feed and Nutrition supplement
    • February 2025
    • January 2025
    • December 2024
    • November 2024
    • October 2024
    • September 2024
    • 2024 Building for the Future supplement
    • August 2024
    • 2024 Poultry Health supplement
    • July 2024
    • 2024 National Egg and Poultry Awards finalists supplement
    • June 2024
    • 2024 Innovation supplement
    • Pig & Poultry Fair 2024
    • May 2024
    • April 2024
    • March 2024
    • February 2024
    • January 2024
    • December 2023
    • November 2023
    • Processing Equipment Supplement – Nov 2023
    • October 2023
    • Building Supplement – Sept 2023
    • September 2023
  • Jobs
    • Browse Jobs
    • Post a Job
    • Manage Jobs
  • Events
    • National Egg and Poultry Awards
    • Poultry Fair
    • Webinars
Twitter LinkedIn
  • FREE Email Newsletters
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact Us
Twitter LinkedIn
Podcast
Poultry News
  • Production
    • Broiler Production
    • Ducks
    • Egg Production
    • Game
    • Hatching
    • Housing
    • Turkeys
  • Processing
  • Business & Politics
    • Business
    • Economics
    • EU & Politics
    • Marketing
    • People
    • Training & Education
  • Welfare
    • Environment
    • Food Safety
    • Vet & Medication
    • Welfare
  • Feed
  • Genetics
  • New Products
  • Magazines
    1. October 2025
    2. September 2025
    3. 2025 Buildings supplement
    4. August 2025
    5. 2025 Poultry Health supplement
    6. July 2025
    7. 2025 National Egg and Poultry Awards finalists supplement
    8. June 2025
    9. 2025 Innovation supplement
    10. May 2025
    11. April 2025
    12. March 2025
    13. 2025 Feed and Nutrition supplement
    14. February 2025
    15. January 2025
    16. December 2024
    17. November 2024
    18. October 2024
    19. September 2024
    20. 2024 Building for the Future supplement
    21. August 2024
    22. 2024 Poultry Health supplement
    23. July 2024
    24. 2024 National Egg and Poultry Awards finalists supplement
    25. June 2024
    26. 2024 Innovation supplement
    27. Pig & Poultry Fair 2024
    28. May 2024
    29. April 2024
    30. March 2024
    31. February 2024
    32. January 2024
    33. December 2023
    34. November 2023
    35. Processing Equipment Supplement – Nov 2023
    36. October 2023
    37. Building Supplement – Sept 2023
    38. September 2023
    Featured

    Poultry Business – October 2025 issue out now

    By Chloe RyanOctober 13, 2025
    Recent

    Poultry Business – October 2025 issue out now

    October 13, 2025

    Poultry Business – September 2025 issue out now

    September 19, 2025

    Poultry Business – 2025 Buildings supplement out now

    September 19, 2025
  • Jobs
    • Browse Jobs
    • Post a Job
    • Manage Jobs
  • Events
    • National Egg and Poultry Awards
    • Poultry Fair
    • Webinars
Twitter LinkedIn
Poultry News
Production

Comment: If you want lower stocking densities, pay for it

Chloe RyanBy Chloe RyanSeptember 28, 20233 Mins Read
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email

By Charles Bourns, broiler grower, Gloucestershire

This month’s theme is nothing new. Years ago, there was competition amongst the retailers to prove ‘how green is my valley’; this has now changed to ‘who has the lowest stocking density?’ It is supposed to show they have higher welfare standards. If only that were true. It is in fact the stockman who demonstrates high welfare, and not the system.

One problem I see is that some producers are growing to 30kg per square metres with Ross 308s and others are using JA87. There is a big difference in cost of production with the two breeds, but because of customers’ lack of knowledge, the retailer gets away with it. The same happens in the Holland where every retailer has its own standard.

Lower stocking densities also adds costs, which the retailer seems reluctant to give back. It also takes the farm performance back several years. My first crop grown in 1989 had a performance of 1.86kg in 42 days with an FCR 2.14:1. Today, I believe 1.86kg would be reached in 32 days with a 1.49 FCR.

The customer has had the benefit of this improvement in performance in giving them a fantastic value for money product. If the retailer wants lower stocking density chicken they will have to pay more. We are happy to produce it.

If we are changing our system widely then we must promote it. We all sell under the Red Tractor brand and they should promote it more, as the Lion Code does with eggs. TV is not as expensive as you might think. I was surprised to hear when British Chicken Marketing was going that the industry spent the same on marketing as Coca Cola. At present all I hear is that the Red Tractor want to bring in new environmental standards. Whilst I know the Wye Valley situation is important – I live seven miles from it – I do not see why their solution needs to adopted by everybody, adding yet more unnecessary costs to all producers.

One of our protein rivals is fish and I found it interesting to discover that on salmon farms they have up to 25% mortality, which everyone seemed to accept, and the farms still made a profit. I make this passing comment to say that just maybe we in the poultry industry should be given more credit for the fantastic job we do.

Lastly it seems that the retailers are queueing up to give the egg industry money to help producers into the industry. Let’s hope it does not encourage too many in and we end up with too many eggs again and depressed prices. Or is that the idea?!

Share. Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email
Previous ArticleHotraco launches new poultry farm controller
Next Article Analysis: RHI scandal victory
Chloe Ryan

Editor of Poultry Business, Chloe has spent the past decade writing about the food industry from farming, through manufacturing, retail and foodservice. When not working, dog walking and reading biographies are her favourite hobbies.

Read Similar Stories

Hatching

GB compartment status is achieved by Cobb Europe

October 17, 20251 Min Read
Egg Production

Rebecca Reeves: A passion for organic

October 16, 20259 Mins Read
Hatching

PD Hook: A fresh chapter

October 14, 20256 Mins Read
Latest News

Noble Foods adds more omelette flavours to its frozen range

October 28, 2025

New poultry sector chair for Red Tractor

October 28, 2025

Two new H5N1 outbreaks confirmed in Wales and Lancashire

October 27, 2025
Sponsored Content

Can Aviance improve production and shell quality in full laying cycle?

October 1, 2025

How can UK farmers make poultry profitable without losing welfare?

September 1, 2025
© 2024 MA Agriculture Ltd, a Mark Allen Group company

Privacy Policy | Cookies Policy | Terms & Conditions

  • Farmers Weekly
  • AA Farmer
  • Farm Contractor
  • Pig World

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.