Poultry News
  • Production
    • Broiler Production
    • Ducks
    • Egg Production
    • Game
    • Hatching
    • Housing
    • Turkeys
  • Processing
  • Business & Politics
    • Business
    • Economics
    • EU & Politics
    • Marketing
    • People
    • Training & Education
  • Welfare
    • Environment
    • Food Safety
    • Vet & Medication
    • Welfare
  • Feed
  • Genetics
  • New Products
  • Magazines
    • May 2026
    • March 2026
    • 2026 Feed & Nutrition supplement
    • February 2026
    • January 2026
    • December 2025
    • November 2025
    • October 2025
    • September 2025
    • 2025 Buildings supplement
    • August 2025
    • 2025 Poultry Health supplement
    • July 2025
    • 2025 National Egg and Poultry Awards finalists supplement
    • June 2025
    • 2025 Innovation supplement
    • May 2025
    • April 2025
    • March 2025
    • 2025 Feed and Nutrition supplement
    • February 2025
    • January 2025
    • December 2024
    • November 2024
    • October 2024
    • September 2024
    • 2024 Building for the Future supplement
    • August 2024
    • 2024 Poultry Health supplement
    • July 2024
    • 2024 National Egg and Poultry Awards finalists supplement
    • June 2024
    • 2024 Innovation supplement
    • Pig & Poultry Fair 2024
    • May 2024
    • April 2024
    • March 2024
    • February 2024
    • January 2024
    • December 2023
    • November 2023
    • Processing Equipment Supplement – Nov 2023
    • October 2023
    • Building Supplement – Sept 2023
    • September 2023
  • Jobs
    • Browse Jobs
    • Post a Job
    • Manage Jobs
  • Events
    • National Egg and Poultry Awards
    • Poultry Fair
    • Webinars
Twitter LinkedIn
  • FREE Email Newsletters
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact Us
Twitter LinkedIn
Podcast
Poultry News
  • Production
    • Broiler Production
    • Ducks
    • Egg Production
    • Game
    • Hatching
    • Housing
    • Turkeys
  • Processing
  • Business & Politics
    • Business
    • Economics
    • EU & Politics
    • Marketing
    • People
    • Training & Education
  • Welfare
    • Environment
    • Food Safety
    • Vet & Medication
    • Welfare
  • Feed
  • Genetics
  • New Products
  • Magazines
    1. May 2026
    2. March 2026
    3. 2026 Feed & Nutrition supplement
    4. February 2026
    5. January 2026
    6. December 2025
    7. November 2025
    8. October 2025
    9. September 2025
    10. 2025 Buildings supplement
    11. August 2025
    12. 2025 Poultry Health supplement
    13. July 2025
    14. 2025 National Egg and Poultry Awards finalists supplement
    15. June 2025
    16. 2025 Innovation supplement
    17. May 2025
    18. April 2025
    19. March 2025
    20. 2025 Feed and Nutrition supplement
    21. February 2025
    22. January 2025
    23. December 2024
    24. November 2024
    25. October 2024
    26. September 2024
    27. 2024 Building for the Future supplement
    28. August 2024
    29. 2024 Poultry Health supplement
    30. July 2024
    31. 2024 National Egg and Poultry Awards finalists supplement
    32. June 2024
    33. 2024 Innovation supplement
    34. Pig & Poultry Fair 2024
    35. May 2024
    36. April 2024
    37. March 2024
    38. February 2024
    39. January 2024
    40. December 2023
    41. November 2023
    42. Processing Equipment Supplement – Nov 2023
    43. October 2023
    44. Building Supplement – Sept 2023
    45. September 2023
    Featured

    Poultry Business – May 2026 issue out now

    By Chloe RyanMay 6, 2026
    Recent

    Poultry Business – May 2026 issue out now

    May 6, 2026

    Poultry Business – April 2026 issue out now

    April 7, 2026

    Poultry Business – March 2026 issue out now

    March 11, 2026
  • Jobs
    • Browse Jobs
    • Post a Job
    • Manage Jobs
  • Events
    • National Egg and Poultry Awards
    • Poultry Fair
    • Webinars
Twitter LinkedIn
Poultry News
Health & Welfare

Proposed US organic standards draw heavy industry criticism

Colin LeyBy Colin LeyJuly 15, 20163 Mins Read
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email

The US-based National Chicken Council (NCC) has warned the US Department of Agriculture (USDA) that its plan to introduce new organic production standards presents “grave risks” to animal health and undermines ongoing efforts to develop global poultry welfare standards.

The NCC warning is contained in a 10-page letter to the USDA, prompted by the publication in April this year of the department’s proposed National Organic Programme (NOP).

Having studied the contents of NOP, the council has now objected to “several” key aspects of the plan (or rule, as it is described by the USDA), including serious concerns about how organic production units should deal with an outbreak of highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI).

The NCC stated, in fact, that it views the plan as being in direct opposition to the US Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS) recommendations for biosecurity.

“In light of the recent (2015), devastating outbreak of HPAI, it is vital farmers retain the ability to make timely preventive measures to protect their flocks,” said the NCC. “Under the proposed rule, however, a ‘documented occurrence of a disease in the region or relevant migratory pathway must be present before outdoor access can be restricted’, with unclear definitions of what constitutes a region or documented occurrence.”

The NCC letter, signed by the council’s senior vice president of scientific and regulatory affairs, Dr Ashley Peterson, also stated that the proposed rule drastically underestimates, or neglects to estimate, the cost of the requirements and the impact of those costs.

“NOP does not include the cost of an avian illness outbreak,” said the NCC, adding that the likelihood and magnitude of an outbreak is materially increased through the proposed outdoor access requirements contained in the proposed rule.

“In other words, avian illness outbreaks like the 2015 HPAI outbreak will be more likely to occur, and the effects will be more likely to be greater, under the proposal. The direct economic consequences of the 2015 HPAI outbreak were estimated to be approximately $3.3 billion (£2.5bn), far overshadowing the anticipated maximum benefit of $62.6 million (£46.9m) per year in the proposed rule.”

In addition, on the issue of the rule’s impact on the development of global welfare standards, the NCC stated that it is concerned that establishing new animal welfare expectations, through the guise of organic production standards, risks moving the US out of alignment with the poultry welfare framework currently being developed by the World Organisation for Animal Health (OIE).

Access full NCC letter

Share. Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email
Previous ArticleAndrea Leadsom is the new Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Secretary
Next Article Farmers warned that Brexit adds volatility to agricultural markets
Colin Ley

Read Similar Stories

Health & Welfare

Do not let poultry biosecurity slip this summer

May 15, 20262 Mins Read
Health & Welfare

New commercial broiler trial into ammonia abatement

May 8, 20264 Mins Read
Health & Welfare

Comment: Concern is rising about Newcastle Disease

May 6, 20262 Mins Read
Latest News

Do not let poultry biosecurity slip this summer

May 15, 2026

Poultry industry rallies behind school fundraising challenge

May 15, 2026

EU poultry prices strengthen as imports rise

May 14, 2026
Sponsored Content

Take Control of Your Farm’s Biosecurity with Livetec

May 1, 2026

Address beta-mannans in broiler diets to optimise bird health and performance

April 1, 2026
© 2024 MA Agriculture Ltd, a Mark Allen Group company

Privacy Policy | Cookies Policy | Terms & Conditions

  • Farmers Weekly
  • AA Farmer
  • Farm Contractor
  • Pig World

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.