Facebook Twitter Instagram
    • FREE Email Newsletters
    • About Us
    • Advertise
    • Contact Us
    • FREE Magazine Subscriptions
    •  
    Twitter LinkedIn
    Podcast
    Poultry News
    • Production
      • Broiler Production
      • Ducks
      • Egg Production
      • Game
      • Hatching
      • Housing
      • Turkeys
    • Processing
    • Business & Politics
      • Business
      • Economics
      • EU & Politics
      • Marketing
      • People
      • Training & Education
    • Welfare
      • Environment
      • Food Safety
      • Vet & Medication
      • Welfare
    • Feed
    • Genetics
    • New Products
    • Magazines
      1. July 2022
      2. June 2022
      3. May 2022
      4. April 2022
      5. February 2022
      6. January 2022
      Featured

      Protected: Poultry Business – July 2022

      By Michael BarkerJune 28, 2022
      Recent

      Protected: Poultry Business – July 2022

      June 28, 2022

      Protected: Finalists Supplement – National Egg & Poultry Awards 2022

      June 27, 2022

      Protected: Innovation Supplement 2022

      June 1, 2022
    • Jobs
      • Browse Jobs
      • Post a Job
      • Manage Jobs
    • Events
      • National Egg and Poultry Awards
      • Poultry Fair
    Poultry News
    Business & Politics

    Analysis: cracking the Irish border issue

    Chloe RyanBy Chloe RyanMay 15, 20189 Mins Read
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email

    This Easter marked the 20th anniversary of the Good Friday agreement, a painstakingly negotiated peace and power sharing agreement that ended decades of violence on the streets of Northern Ireland.

    People and goods freely flow over the border between the North and the Republic, essential for the numerous businesses that treat the island as one trading entity. The free movement of trade and lack of any border controls have helped successfully maintain the peace and allow both countries to grow economically.

    Now a lack of agreement on how to handle the Irish border after Brexit means all of that is under threat. Political stalemate at Stormont has only exacerbated the uncertainty, with the two main parties Sinn Fein and the DUP locked in a bitter dispute that means the Northern Irish parliament has had no executive for over a year.

    Despite progress in March in meetings between the prime minister and the EU that hammered out a transition deal post-Brexit, the current position is that the EU has rejected all of the UK Government’s suggestions for resolving the Northern Irish border issue.

    A report in the Daily Telegraph claimed that all of the UK’s current proposals for avoiding a hard border had been dismissed out of hand by the EU as unworkable. Having ruled out a customs union with the EU, the UK instead set out plans for either a customs partnership or a customs arrangement. Both of which options are unsatisfactory to EU negotiators.

    This has grave implications for the food sector. The Chartered Institute of Environmental Health (CIEH) has gone so far as to say the Government ‘fails to recognise many of the central concerns about food’.

    Technological solutions

    Although the UK has so far focussed on ‘technological solutions’ as a way of allowing frictionless border traffic in Ireland and at other ports of entry into the UK, a recent paper published by CIEH and the Food Research Collaboration at City University has made it clear that such solutions simply do not currently exist and don’t address the need for physical checks.

    The report warned that Northern Ireland’s food supply could be a risk of serious disruption if the Government continued to neglect the border issue when conducting negotiations.

    Tony Lewis, Head of Policy at CIEH, said: “It is very disappointing to see the Government continuing with this misguided approach to the key issue of the Northern Irish border post-Brexit.

    “It has been made very clear to British negotiators that by solely pursuing technological solutions, they are ignoring the continuing need for physical inspection of food imported into the UK. Such inspections, by competent environmental health professionals, ensures that food is what it claims to be, comes from where it says it does and is safe.

    “The apparent inability to distinguish between customs checks and food safety measures is deeply concerning, and we strongly urge the Government to talk to food safety professionals to ensure that our food supply and safety systems are properly prepared for Brexit.”

    And the CIEH is hardly alone in its concerns.

    The Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy (BEIS) Committee warned in April the Government was almost out of time to negotiate an orderly trade system after the Brexit transition, risking a significant impact on consumers, businesses and workers in the processed food and drink sector.

    So what are the options?

    Assuming May gets her way and the Brexit bill passes through parliament in a way that means the UK will leave the customs union, there are several possible scenarios, all of which have serious downsides.

    The first is a physical barrier at the border, manned by staff who would check and record the crossing of consignments between the North and the Republic to ensure the correct tariffs and taxes were paid. There are huge concerns however that any physical border would become a target for violent protest and could eventually undermine the peace agreement. No party wants a hard border.

    The second is having no physical border open but monitoring it virtually with the use of technology, to ensure taxes and tariffs are paid. This is the solution put forwards by Boris Johnson, the foreign secretary.

    Baroness Lucy Neville-Rolfe, former government minister, member of the House of Lords, and chair of Red Tractor told Poultry Business in an interview this option was the likeliest. It would mean, she said, there would be no physical wall, and there would be “some sort of controls similar to how VAT is different, tax is different. It’ll be more consignment based with the smaller firms allowing to go relatively un-regulated.”

    But no details have been forthcoming about what exactly this technology would be that would allow a border to be monitored remotely, or even whether such technology currently exists. And would it be acceptable for firms to be able to cross the border unregulated? And as the CIEH has pointed out, this would have implications for food safety.

    The third solution is to keep the customs union for Northern Ireland, which would mean the island of Ireland remained on the same page, and the border was effectively shifted into the Irish sea between the island of Ireland and the rest of the UK.

    This is the ‘backstop’ position – agreed by the EU and UK during March’s negotiations – that will happen if no other solution can be found. However, May has said repeatedly this is a solution to which no UK prime minister could ever agree.

    And just last week, Democratic Unionists said they would bring down the Government if Northern Ireland is forced to stay in a customs union after Brexit.

    May‘s governing partners said that leaving the customs union with the rest of the UK was an ‘absolute red line’.

    Nigel Dodds, leader of the DUP in Westminster, said his party could never accept a deal that led to Northern Ireland being treated differently from the rest of Britain.

    He told the Conservative Home website: “If, as a result of the Brexit negotiations, there was to be any suggestion that Northern Ireland would be treated differently – in a way for instance that we were part of a customs union and a single market and the rest of the UK wasn’t – for us that would be a red line, which we would vote against the Government, because you might as well have a Corbyn government pursuing openly its anti-Unionist policies as have a Conservative government doing it by a different means.”

    Farmer demands

    The Ulster Farmers’ Union (UFU) has huge concerns about what will happen to the 70% of farm exports that currently go to the EU, and how the border will be managed.

    UFU president Ivor Ferguson said: “From the outset of the Brexit process we have stressed that the border solution must allow the long-standing trade relationships between Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland to continue with minimal disruption. These are relationships that affect all of agriculture, and which have been in place since long before the UK and Ireland joined the then EEC. That being said – GB is and will most likely remain our main market. It is essential that whatever is agreed must also allow Northern Ireland to continue to sell food into the rest of the UK unhindered.

    “It goes without saying – a workable border solution that creates no additional controls either north to south or east to west is crucial. Politicians made a number of promises during the Brexit campaign, and farmers are looking to them to deliver. Any agreement that hampers this trade is unacceptable.

    “The Northern Ireland and Republic of Ireland food supply chains, across all agricultural commodities, have become tightly integrated over the years and trade is very fluid. Northern Ireland farmers supply processors in the Republic of Ireland and vice versa. There are also many farm businesses along the border – a number with land on both sides.

    “With less than a year to go until Brexit, farmers and growers across Northern Ireland need to know how the industry will be protected from cheap food imports; what arrangements will be made to maintain existing trade with the EU-27, Ireland and the UK and how the industry will be supported. The government has been hinting that it will do the right things – but farming is a long-term industry that has to plan.  Not knowing what trade arrangements will be in place or how it will be supported makes that impossible.

    “In addition, with the political stalemate at Stormont continuing, decisions on many critical agri-related issues are not being taken and this needs to be addressed. The absence of a working local government and a Minister to raise the voice of farmers, is extremely unhelpful moving forward. A way has to be found to ensure that these decisions can be made, particularly at this time of huge change for the industry.”

    Transition deal

    Talks in March between Theresa May and the EU’s Brexit negotiators in Brussels led to a big breakthrough and formed the basis of the 21-month transition deal that will avoid the dreaded ‘cliff edge’ scenario.

    The transition deal means many trading arrangements will be rolled over, providing an additional buffer for businesses. According to the CIEH, Northern Ireland exports £1.15 billion worth of food to the EU, about 70% of which goes to or through the Republic of Ireland.

    To reach an agreement, the UK had to make compromises, agreeing to grant EU citizens arriving in the country during the transition the same rights as those arriving before Brexit.

    British negotiators also softened their position on fisheries access, prompting protest from Nigel Farage and others who threw dead fish from a boat into the Thames in a publicity stunt.

    But the Irish border is the glaring omission even now a transition deal has been hammered out. And as of now, there are no convincing solutions to the problem that as well as causing huge expense and confusion for business could even threaten the hard-won peace.

    Share. Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email
    Previous ArticleFeature: Chicken kings – the rise of chicken in fast food
    Next Article Make food production a priority in future agricultural policy, says Red Tractor Assurance
    Chloe Ryan

    Editor of Poultry Business, Chloe has spent the past decade writing about the food industry from farming, through manufacturing, retail and foodservice. When not working, dog walking and reading biographies are her favourite hobbies.

    Read Similar Stories

    Business

    LJ Fairburn reports reduced profits

    July 4, 2022
    Business

    Jack Brand reports operating loss after ‘poor’ performance

    July 4, 2022
    Business & Politics

    NFU president highlights why food security matters

    June 28, 2022
    Most Read

    LJ Fairburn reports reduced profits

    July 4, 2022

    Lohmann installs in-ovo sexing technology

    July 4, 2022

    Jack Brand reports operating loss after ‘poor’ performance

    July 4, 2022
    © 2022 Lewis Business Media. All Rights Reserved.
    Lewis Business Media, Suite A, Arun House, Office Village, River Way, Uckfield, TN22 1SL

    Privacy Policy | Cookie Policy | Terms & Conditions

    • AA Farmer
    • Farm Contractor
    • Pig World
    • OvertheCounter

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

    We use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences and repeat visits. By clicking “ACCEPT ALL”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies. However, you may visit "Cookie Settings" to provide a controlled consent.
    Cookie SettingsREJECT ALLAccept All
    Manage consent

    Privacy Overview

    This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
    Necessary
    Always Enabled
    Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. These cookies ensure basic functionalities and security features of the website, anonymously.
    CookieDurationDescription
    AWSALBCORS7 daysThis cookie is managed by Amazon Web Services and is used for load balancing.
    cookielawinfo-checkbox-necessary1 yearSet by the GDPR Cookie Consent plugin, this cookie is used to record the user consent for the cookies in the "Necessary" category .
    PHPSESSIDsessionThis cookie is native to PHP applications. The cookie is used to store and identify a users' unique session ID for the purpose of managing user session on the website. The cookie is a session cookies and is deleted when all the browser windows are closed.
    Others
    Other uncategorized cookies are those that are being analyzed and have not been classified into a category as yet.
    CookieDurationDescription
    AWSALB7 daysAWSALB is a cookie generated by the Application load balancer in the Amazon Web Services. It works slightly different from AWSELB.
    explat_test_aa_weekly_lohp_2021_week_4517 days 8 hoursNo description
    ppwp_wp_session30 minutesNo description
    tk_ai14 daysGathers information for WordPress by themselves, first party analytics tool about how WP services are used. A collection of internal metrics for user activity, used to improve user experience.
    tk_qssessionGathers information for WordPress by themselves, first party analytics tool about how WP services are used. A collection of internal metrics for user activity, used to improve user experience.
    Advertisement
    Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with relevant ads and marketing campaigns. These cookies track visitors across websites and collect information to provide customized ads.
    CookieDurationDescription
    OAGEOsessionOpenX sets this cookie to avoid the repeated display of the same ad.
    OAID1 yearThis cookie is set when an AdsWizz website visitor have opted out the collection of information by AdsWizz service or opted to disable the targeted ads by AdsWizz.
    Analytics
    Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.
    CookieDurationDescription
    _ga2 yearsThe _ga cookie, installed by Google Analytics, calculates visitor, session and campaign data and also keeps track of site usage for the site's analytics report. The cookie stores information anonymously and assigns a randomly generated number to recognize unique visitors.
    _gat_gtag_UA_31822138_71 minuteSet by Google to distinguish users.
    _gid1 dayInstalled by Google Analytics, _gid cookie stores information on how visitors use a website, while also creating an analytics report of the website's performance. Some of the data that are collected include the number of visitors, their source, and the pages they visit anonymously.
    tk_lr1 yearThe tk_lr is a referral cookie set by the JetPack plugin on sites using WooCommerce, which analyzes referrer behaviour for Jetpack.
    tk_or5 yearsThe tk_or is a referral cookie set by the JetPack plugin on sites using WooCommerce, which analyzes referrer behaviour for Jetpack.
    tk_r3d3 daysJetPack installs this cookie to collect internal metrics for user activity and in turn improve user experience.
    SAVE & ACCEPT
    Powered by CookieYes Logo